Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e267-e275, 2022 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1701610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The extent to which vaccinated persons diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can transmit to other vaccinated and unvaccinated persons is unclear. METHODS: Using data from the San Francisco Department of Public Health, this report describes outcomes of household contact tracing during 29 January-2 July 2021, where fully vaccinated patients with COVID-19 were the index case in the household. RESULTS: Among 248 fully vaccinated patients with breakthrough infections, 203 (82%) were symptomatic and 105 were identified as the index patient within their household. Among 179 named household contacts, 71 (40%) contacts tested, over half (56%) were fully vaccinated and the secondary attack rate was 28%. Overall transmission from a symptomatic fully vaccinated patient with breakthrough infection to household contacts was suspected in 14 of 105 (13%) of households. Viral genomic sequencing of samples from 44% of fully vaccinated patients showed that 82% of those sequenced were infected by a variant of concern or interest and 77% by a variant carrying mutation(s) associated with resistance to neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission from fully vaccinated symptomatic index patients to vaccinated and unvaccinated household contacts can occur. Indoor face masking and timely testing of all household contacts should be considered when a household member receives a positive test result in order to identify and interrupt transmission chains.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Contact Tracing , COVID-19/prevention & control , Family Characteristics , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco/epidemiology
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(2): 324-327, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315663

ABSTRACT

We report the public health response to a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in a San Francisco shelter where 67% of residents and 17% of staff tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We describe the limited utility of case investigation, person-based contact tracing and symptom screening, and the benefits of mass testing in outbreak response.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco/epidemiology
3.
J Public Health Policy ; 42(2): 211-221, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258617

ABSTRACT

In order to effectively control spread of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), it is essential that jurisdictions have the capacity to rapidly trace close contacts of each and every case. Best practice guidance on how to implement such programs is urgently needed. We describe the early experience in the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), where the City's Department of Health expanded contact tracing capability in anticipation of changes in San Francisco's 'shelter in place' order between April and June 2020. Important prerequisites to successful scale-up included a rapid expansion of the COVID-19 response workforce, expansion of testing capability, and other containment resources. San Francisco's scale-up offers a model for how other jurisdictions can rapidly mobilize a workforce. We underscore the importance of an efficient digital case management system, effective training, and expansion of supportive service programs for those in quarantine or isolation, and metrics to ensure continuous performance improvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Contact Tracing/methods , Public Health Administration/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Data Management/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Pandemics , Quarantine/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco/epidemiology , Social Work/organization & administration
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(11): 2018-2020, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1249278

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 can cause significant mortality in the elderly in long-term care facilities (LTCF). We describe 4 LTCF outbreaks where mass testing identified a high proportion of asymptomatic infections (4%-41% in healthcare workers and 20%-75% in residents), indicating that symptom-based screening alone is insufficient for monitoring for COVID-19 transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Long-Term Care , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco , Skilled Nursing Facilities
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(10): 1173-1180, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-974825

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe epidemiologic and genomic characteristics of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak in a large skilled-nursing facility (SNF), and the strategies that controlled transmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted during March 22-May 4, 2020, among all staff and residents at a 780-bed SNF in San Francisco, California. METHODS: Contact tracing and symptom screening guided targeted testing of staff and residents; respiratory specimens were also collected through serial point prevalence surveys (PPSs) in units with confirmed cases. Cases were confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to characterize viral isolate lineages and relatedness. Infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions included restricting from work any staff who had close contact with a confirmed case; restricting movement between units; implementing surgical face masking facility-wide; and the use of recommended PPE (ie, isolation gown, gloves, N95 respirator and eye protection) for clinical interactions in units with confirmed cases. RESULTS: Of 725 staff and residents tested through targeted testing and serial PPSs, 21 (3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive: 16 (76%) staff and 5 (24%) residents. Fifteen cases (71%) were linked to a single unit. Targeted testing identified 17 cases (81%), and PPSs identified 4 cases (19%). Most cases (71%) were identified before IPC interventions could be implemented. WGS was performed on SARS-CoV-2 isolates from 4 staff and 4 residents: 5 were of Santa Clara County lineage and the 3 others were distinct lineages. CONCLUSIONS: Early implementation of targeted testing, serial PPSs, and multimodal IPC interventions limited SARS-CoV-2 transmission within the SNF.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Cohort Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL